中國網浪潮資訊  近日，世界著名學術出版商德國斯普林格(Springer)發佈消息，稱其旗下的期刊《腫瘤生物學》(Tumor Biology)因作者編造審稿人和審稿意見而撤稿107篇論文。

CNCAO NEWS Recently, the world famous academic publisher in Germany Springer published the message that its journal "cancer biology" withdrew 107 papersby the author making up the reviewer and comments.

　　據統計，被撤稿的107篇論文作者來自125家中國研究機構，其中涉及浙江的醫院和高校有12家，涉及32人。

According to statistics, the author of withdrew 107 papers are from 125 Chinese research institutions, including 12 Zhejiang universitiesand hospitals, involving 32 people.

　　對於斯普林格的撤稿事件，杭州某三甲醫院泌尿科醫生王淺(應受訪者要求，用化名)用了“有創意”三個字。

For Springer's retraction events, Wang Qian(this is a pseudonym as he demanded),a urologist from a top three hospital in Hangzhou used this word:original.

　　他表示，以前聽説的大部分都是數據造假，但是冒用本領域專家的名字申請郵件地址，在專家不知情的情況下，從虛假郵箱向期刊提供正面誇讚論文的審稿意見的方式，他是第一次聽説。“相當於自己既當選手，又做裁判員。”

He said that most things heard before are data fraud, but assumed the expert’s identity in the field for the e-mail address when the expert knew nothing about it and provided the positive comments about praising his papers from false mail to journal, Wang Qian have never heard of that. "You can call him both competitor and judge."

　　對於涉嫌造假的醫生，王淺並不同情。“醫生之間，大家都是辛苦人，都是在現有規則下拼搏努力。要遵循現有規則去做事情的。像這種方式，就是一種學術不端，學術道德惡劣。對醫院的名譽、學校的名譽都有損害。”

Wang Qian were not so sympathetic with the alleged fraud doctors.He said, "Between doctors, we are all hard people, struggling to work under the existing rules. Follow the rules to do things. In this way, it is a kind of academic misconduct. Damage the reputation of the hospitals anduniversities."

　　學界專家熊丙奇認為，中國要建立起與國際接軌的學術管理與評價體系。 “一個真正嚴肅的學者，根本不會請‘第三方機構’發表論文。”

Xiong Bingqi, one of the academic experts believes that China should establish an international academic management and evaluation system. "A truly serious scholar will never ask the third parties to publish papers."

　　（中國網作者 楊雲寒 見習作者 胡金 綜合報道 宓文文/譯）

來源： 中國網綜合    | 作者：楊雲寒 見習 胡金 宓文文/譯    | 責編：楊雲寒    審核：張淵

新聞投稿：184042016@qq.com    新聞熱線：13157110107